19
Oct
09

Priorities


I was presenting a ‘Keep the Hunting Act’ petition on the doorstep last week. I found the response very interesting. A vast majority ofPetition respondents signed the petition, admittedly I was in Brighton which is not representative of the nation, but I maintain that the ban has public support, a recent poll suggesting support was at 75%. People who signed the petition were from a cross-section of parties including the Conservatives, in fact the very same poll concluded that 62% of Conservative voters support the ban, yet still the Tory leadership call for a vote. This, to me, seems shocking but support has already been discussed at length on this blog; I want to deal with something else.

One response that I received at the doorstep was very interesting; I was told that our priorities were wrong, that whilst he agreed with the petition he would not sign it. I was told we should be talking about the economy, about jobs. There is some sense in what he said, we need to talk The cruelty of huntersabout the economy, and we need to talk about all the big issues that affect everyone. This does not mean that we should allow the Conservatives to trample on our legacy and pursue their own self-interest. It would be foolish for us to base our whole election campaign on hunting, but we must show people what the Tories will do if they come to power.

The Conservative eagerness to repeal the Hunting Act demonstrates three things. Firstly it shows their continued support for bloodlust something partly due to hunting being embedded deep into Tory culture but also due to the finance the hunt lobby continue to provide for the Tories. Secondly it represents a challenge to Parliamentary democracy, turning back more than fifty years of campaigning, mass public support and . Thirdly it suggests a broader return to the old order, where Conservative MP’s defend their own interests and protect their own hobbies over what is right.

When we look at priorities, the Conservatives want to give themselves and their buddies the right to chase foxes and have their dogs slaughter them; weDavid Cameron want to create jobs for the unemployed, opportunities for the young working generation and help for the most vulnerable. It is not Labour that has their priorities wrong. It is the Conservatives who have gone out of their way to formulate a scheme to bring fox hunting back; we are only defending what is ethically right. Labour has better policies around the key issues and the Conservative lack substance in all the main policy areas. It is our job to raise awareness of hunting and many other issues where the Conservatives are wrongly prioritising and more importantly wrong.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Catch up zone

What’s hot

Fox in Parliament on Twitter

  • Thanks for everyone’s support over the years. Fox in Parliament is ending, we may be back perhaps! There are... fb.me/7yPyZXM2WTweeted 1 year ago
  • If the foxes could talk, what do you think they would want to say for fox hunters? fb.me/KoXCr3StTweeted 1 year ago
  • “They're animals, all right. But why are you so goddam sure that makes us human beings?" Stephen King We liked... fb.me/7w6rRbIOYTweeted 1 year ago

RSS News from the Leuage Against Cruel Sports

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Fox in Parliament Stats

  • 50,242 hits & views

Flickr Photos

Come back here!

Sky on fire

Northern harriers and kung fu fighting

More Photos

2009

October 2009
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Top Clicks

  • None

Menue


%d bloggers like this: